HOME BIBLE STUDY GROUP
HOME BIBLE STUDY GROUP | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. The two Christianities
The word Christianity derives from Christ. The words Messiah and Christ are the anglicized words of the Hebrew and Greek words respectively meaning the Anointed.
The role of the Anointed, Christ/Messiah, both Son of God and Son of man, was to destroy the works of the devil and to reconcile the world to God the Father and to Himself. This information is crucial for understanding the severity of the fall of Eve and Adam, requiring the death of the only begotten Son of God to repair the damages.
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
(I John 3:8)For it pleased the Father that in him should all fullness dwell; and, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
(Colossians 1: 19,20)
The Incarnation is a fulfillment of a promise and prophecy made to Adam and Eve by the Creator after the fall of man: The Seed of the woman will bruise the Serpent’s head.
And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. (Genesis 3:15)
Satan was not looking forward to the realization of this promise. How can he foil God’s plan? Pollute the human race by interbreeding with Satan’s fallen angels and by indulging mankind into false worship and idolatry. Then, the Incarnation will be impossible.
This happened when man began to multiply on the face of the earth.
And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them
That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and they took them wives of all which they chose.
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
(Genesis 6:1,2,4)
This time period coincides with the first eras of all ancient civilizations studied so far, that is some 5000 years ago, when beings from the Star Sirius came to planet Earth to give man knowledge and civilization, including religious practices (see Table I). These beings were often described as amphibians, half human and half reptilian: head and chest, humanlike, but from the waist down, having one or two tails of a serpent. They experienced some difficulty in walking. Apparently they ruled mankind ever since.
“The Serpent Kings reigned over the Earth. It was these Serpent Kings who founded the mystery schools which later appeared as the Egyptian and Brahmin mysteries” (1).
Now, we know where ancient civilizations came from, Serpent Kings. The study of ancient civilizations, therefore, is an appraisal of the legacy of these Serpent Kings to fallen man. The fall of Eve and Adam was so severe that although they were created in the image of God, their descendents a few centuries later degenerated to the point of worshipping reptilian demons from the star Sirius. These intruders essentially took over. The Creator’s response to this challenge was the flood, saving only four men and four women.
Some of these amphibians survived the flood. Soon after the flood, the Chaldeans worshipped the child Dagon and his mother Beltis (2). These were called merman and mermaid, suggesting reptilian lower extremities. Mankind seems to have developed a fatal attraction for these amphibian demons. Regarding the physical characteristics of Dagon:
“The god Dagon is often figured in the reliefs of the Palace of Sargon, on Babylonian cylinder seals, on Phoenician and Persian coins, on Greco-Phoenician scarabs, with forms similar to those of the Greek Triton” (3).
A description of Triton follows:
“Above the hips, says Apollonius of Rhodes, his body was a shape similar to that of the bodies of the blessed gods, but below his flanks on both sides, were aligned the two extremities of the tail of an enormous sea-monster” (4).
So, Dagon was/is an amphibian humanoid, with a human upper body and reptilian lower extremities. Beltis was called the “Queen of Haven.” Her son Dagon was later worshipped as the Indo-Iranian Sun deity, Mithra, the “Mediator,” who could wash away sin. His mother, now called Mylitta, “The Mediatrix,” could also wash away sin (2). As you can see, Satan was not wasting any time: the sun god Mithra was called, “The Seed”, and his mother was virgin, pure and undefiled. During the second and third century AD, Mitra traveled west and became the roman “invictus deus solis Mithras”, the invincible sungod savior Mitras (5).
Operation pollute failed. Initiate operation counterfeit messiah as soon as possible. Invent a reincarnating Sun god with proper timing such that the final incarnation will coincide as close as possible with the real Messiah: the closer the two incarnations, the more convincing the counterfeit. This would also create doubt and confusion about the reality of the true Messiah, classifying Him as mythology.
Satan has invented “the seed of the woman,” way ahead of the real One. He could claim that the real One was a copycat: a pagan origin of the Christ myth. But he did not know the date of birth. So a good guess would be the winter solstice, corresponding in the Roman calendar to December 25. Here we have it: Mithra was born on December 25. This pattern of a Sun deity who would reincarnate cyclically at the winter solstice (Christmas) to reform and rule mankind persisted in subsequent pagan civilizations, down to the Roman era (6).
Satan possessed his own prophets and prophetesses who would foretell the future incarnation of the Sun god. For the Romans, the prophesies were recorded in the Sibylline oracles (7). The name Sibylline comes from the name of the first prophetess called Sibylla, daughter of Zeus and Lamia (8). Zeus/Jupiter is the prince amongst the twelve Olympian gods (9), and his main festival was the Olympic Games, called Penteteric, because this festival occurred every 5 years. Christian athletes who participate in Olympic games are entertaining the Serpent King Zeus/Jupiter, a form of idolatry. Lamia was/is a goddess who stole and ate children (11).
According to the Sybylline oracles, the last Incarnation of the Sun god Apollo was due in 15BC. This Son of God would usher in an era of universal Peace. He would be a Prince of Peace, a Savior who washes away the original sin. The Roman Apotheosis of Augustus in 15BC fulfilled this prophecy. According to the Hindu chronology, the last Incarnation of the Black Sun, Ies Chrisna was expected in the year 78BC, under the title of Salivahana, son-of-a-virgin, to occur just before the final destruction of the world (12). After the Romans entered India, the Hindus accepted the birth of Augustus Caesar for the era of Salivahana.
“Nicoli di Conti, who traveled in Bengal and other parts of India during the early part of the 15th century, declares that in the orient, Augustus and the Indian Vicramaditya (or Salivahana) were regarded as the same. “De Comitibus,” published in A.D. 1444. A famous holiday is still observed in India which may have furnished a date (Aswin 1st, or August 29th) to the Augustan cult of Rome” (12).
Alexander Del Mar was Director of the US Bureau of statistics in the late 1800’s. His avocation was ancient coins collection for the purpose of studying ancient civilizations. He published a book with precious information not easily available elsewhere. To summarize his findings regarding the deifications of Julius and August Caesar:
Julius Caesar
100 BC = Birth
83 BC = He became a priest of Jupiter at 17 years of age.
73 BC = He became a cardinal of Jupiter, that is member of the Sacred College of Cardinals.
Age = 27 years old
64 BC = He was elected Pontifex Maximus (Vicar) of Jupiter
48 BC = Apotheosis (deification) at the Temple of Jupiter Ammon in Alexandria Egypt by the priests of Jupiter. This occurred on the winter solstice, December 25, Christmas day.
47 BC = Calendar Reform. The custom of kissing his foot was introduced at court.
44 BC = March 15 – Assassination
Augustus Caesar
63 BC = Sept. 23 – Birth
He was claimed to be the incarnation of the Sun god Apollo.
40 BC = Virgil’s fourth eclogue.
Augustus declared Son of God.
Stamped on coins of that year.
28 BC = First regnal year in Rome.
25 BC = Imperial accession
15 BC = Apotheosis in Rome
Augustan era supercedes the Julian era of Rome
Worship of Augustus as Son of God
Prince of Peace.
Permanent closure of the Temple of Janus.
Original sin swept away.
8 BC = Apotheosis in Egypt
Worshipped as incarnation of Dionysus.
Beginning of Dionysian cycle of 532 years.
14 AD = August 29 – Death
We will quote Del Mar, regarding the worship of Augustus Caesar, the origin of our common era, and the greatest deception perpetrated on the Christian world. Commenting on the Apotheosis of Augustus in Rome in 15 BC:
“It appears to have been the common practice of the Roman Church, whether pagan or Christian, to employ the aera of Augustus, or Anno Domini, the year of our Lord; the pagans meaning our Lord Augustus Caesar and the Christians our Lord Jesus Christ. The object of the 15 years afterwards added was evidently to destroy the identity of these two aeras” (pg. 29).
“It is simply asserted that the aera which we now use is in fact the aera of Augustus, altered by post-Augustan astrologers, under direction or with consent of the Latin Sacred College, to the extent of 15 years” (pg. 33).
“Enough has been shown to prove to the most unwilling reader that the calendar has been altered and that, in this respect and the important consequences that flow from it, the Christian world has been grossly deceived” (pg. 286).
Del Mar proved beyond any doubt that during the first few centuries AD, a total of 15 years were added to the reign of several emperors: the 19th year of Tiberius: 1; Nero: 1; Pertinax: 1; Diocletian: 2; Constantine II: 1; Valens: 2; Theodosius: 1; Arcadius: 1; Leo: 1; Justin II: 4. The purpose of this forgery was to push back the Apotheosis of Augustus 15 years in relation of the AD dating and to connect our common era with Jesus Christ, not Emperor Augustus. It would be too obvious if our common era started with the Apotheosis of Augustus.
Since the perpetrators were not infallible, they made some mistakes by not covering all their tracks. For example, Herod the Great who tried to kill Jesus Christ when He was two years old, was dead four years before the pretended date of birth of Jesus Christ. The Anno Christo of Abyssinia was AD8, not AD1. This date of the Incarnation by the early Abyssinian Christians was probably computed before the 15 years were added to the Augustan era. If the Augustan era AD1 started in 15 BC, the year of the Apotheosis, the Augustan AD8 would then correspond to 8BC of our common era. If the Augustan era started January 1st 14BC, AD8 of the Augustan era would correspond to 7BC of our common era (Fig. 1).
The Augustan era was used unaltered for several centuries. The altered version, which is our common era began to be used in the 8th century AD and was not fully established until the 15th century AD, coinciding with the discovery of the printing press by Johan Gutenberg (1398-1468). With this invention, Imperial Christianity lost control over their exclusivity on written manuscripts in the Western world.
“The Vulgar Era began to prevail in the West about the time of Charles Martel, and Pope Gregory II. A.D. 730;… But it was not established till the time of Pope Eugenius IV, A.D. 1431, who ordered this era to be used in the public Registers: according to Mariana and others” (13).
There is one more piece of evidence in favor of 7BC of our common era for the year of the incarnation of the Creator of heaven and earth. Ancient chronologers, expert in Indian Antiquities, but unaware of the fact that the era of Salivahana was actually the date of birth of Augustus Caesar, have dated the era of Salivahana at 56 years before the birth of Jesus Christ (14). Based on our common era, Augustus birth is dated at 63 BC. To compute the year of birth of Jesus Christ, substract 56 years from 63 BC and you obtain 7 BC. Let us now continue our quotations of Del Mar’s excellent investigative work.
“The worship of Augustus was not, as the ecclesiastical schools have insinuated, a mere lip-service, a meaningless mode of saluting the sovereign-pontiff, an effusive form of adulation or flattery to the emperor of Rome; it was the worship of a personage who was believed to be supernatural, omniscient, all-powerful and beneficent, the re-incarnation of Quirinus, the Son of the god Apollo and of the wife-virgin Maia; the god whose coming was foretold by the Cumaen Sibyl; whose sway was to extend over the whole earth; whose Conception and Birth were both miraculous; and whose Advent was to usher in the Golden Age of Peace and Plenty and to banish Sin forever. Such was his character in Rome. In Greece he was worshipped as Dionysos; in Egypt as Thurinus; in Iberia and Gaul as Aesar, or Hesus; and in Germany as Baldir; for all of these titles and many others will be found on his monuments, or have been preserved by his biographers” (Pg. 314).
“From this time forward the worship of Augustus as the Son of God became the official religion of Rome. From the chronological evidence furnished by coins, some of the most important institutes of the empire have been traced to this date” (Pg. 183).
“The Senate recognized him as the long predicted and expected Sacrosanct, or Messiah, a fact that Augustus mentions in his will, which is carved on the temple of Ancyra, still standing with the inscription upon it” (Pg. 171).
“In the inscriptions of the recently exhumed public edifices of Ephesus, Augustus is addressed as the Son of God” (Pg. 171).
“The worship of Augustus, Son of God, was officially incorporated into the religion of the empire; every city of the empire had an augustal flamen, every house an augustal shrine; succeeding emperors themselves sacrificed to Augustus, and irreverence to this deity was visited with the severest penalties” (Pg. 327).
“Upon these altars costly offerings and bloody sacrifices were made. One of the latter consisted of 300 senators and equities, who were coldly slaughtered by order of Augustus upon the ides of March, A.U. 713, on a Julian altar at Perugia, to propitiate the god Divus Julius” (Pg. 308).
In the Oxford Classical Dictionary, under Rome, it is stated that 700 senators out of 1000 had sworn a personal oath of loyalty to Octavian (10). Octavian is Augustus. No mention is made of the whereabouts of the other 300 senators. The impression then is that Augustus only got 70% of the votes. The information supplied by Alex Del Mar strongly suggests that the remaining 700 senators that were not sacrificed, pledged their allegiance to Augustus under extreme duress.
“With the street effigies of Augustus, of which Ovid informs us there were a thousand in Rome alone, the members of Augustus’ family, the Holy Family, as Ovid calls it, namely, his wife, Livia, and one of his adopted sons, Drusus-both of whom were canonized-were sometimes associated” (Pg. 320).
Augustus, as Pontifex Maximus of Jupiter, had the authority to canonize anyone he wanted to sainthood, that is Imperial sainthood or Satanic sainthood, which has nothing to do with the disciples of Jesus Christ called “saints” in The New Testament (See Table IV).
“To this may be added the fact that of all the memorials of the distant past which the Vatican preserves with the most jealous care is the marble image of Divus Augustus” (Pg. 329).
The birth of Jesus Christ occurred at a time when the worship of Augustus was worldwide and in full swing. Satan had finally succeeded in presenting his Imperial Christ to the world at the Roman Apotheosis of Augustus in 15BC, 8 years before the Incarnation. Satan further fine tuned it with the Alexandrian Apotheosis in Egypt just one year before the birth of Jesus Christ. It is obvious that Satan did not know the date nor the year of the Incarnation, so, his plan was to invent a re-incarnating sun god whose final incarnation would coincide with the birth of the real Messiah. The closer the chronology of the two Christs, the more convincing is the counterfeit messiah. He was off by 56 years based on the births of both Christs. To offset this difference, he resorted to the deification process. The Sybilline oracles were designed in such a way that “The Libri Sybillini offered an ideal tool for the manipulation of the State religion” (15). Potter claimed that Augustus consulted the oracle under obscure circumstances: “Another investigation of oracular texts was carried out by Augustus, though here the circumstances are obscure.” (15)
Alexander Del Mar shed some light on this obscurity:
“But that personage, in order to prove that he was the Messiah and Prince of Peace foretold in the Sibylls in connection with the sixth Ludi saeculares, sank 78 years from the Roman calendar and re-celebrated the sixth as the seventh Ludi in A.U. 738, when he was apotheosized and proclaimed in Rome as the Son of God, or Mediator, inter dies et
Satan should have known better. The Creator stated clearly that He has exclusivity on prophecy:
Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else, I am God, and there is none like me,
declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand,
and I will do all my pleasure.
(Isaiah 46:9,10)
For the past two thousand years, Imperial Christianity, founded by the deified first Roman Emperor Augustus, has constantly persecuted Evangelical Christians. There are several books written on this subject (17-26). This presentation will concentrate on two areas of controversy: the weekly Sabbath versus Sunday; and the celebration of the Lord’s Supper versus the celebration of Easter. The word Easter derives from Ishtar, the Babylonian queen of heaven, equivalent to the Egyptian goddess Isis, the Chadean Beltis, the Hindu Durga, the Indo-Iranian Myllita, the Greek Hera, and the Roman Juno. Essentially, the celebration of Easter is the worship of the reptilian goddess Isis, whose throne is on the Sirius stellar complex, the abode of the dead. In the time of the prophet Jeremiah, the Jews living in Jerusalem worshipped the queen of heaven just before their deportation to Babylonian slavery. The Most High is a jealous God and does not take idolatry lightly.
Seest thou not what they do in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem?
The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.
(Jeremiah 7:18,19)
According to Hislop (26), Lent and Easter were celebrated by many pagan civilizations centuries before the birth of Jesus Christ.
“What means the term Easter itself? It is not a Christian name. It bears its Chaldean origin on its very forehead. … That name, as found by Layard on the Assyrian monuments, is Ishtar. … The forty days’ abstinence of Lent was directly borrowed from the worshippers of the Babylonian goddess.”
“Such a Lent of forty days, “in the spring of the year,” is still observed by the Yezidis or Pagan Devil-worshippers of Koordistan, who have inherited it from their early masters, the Babylonians.”
“Such a Lent of forty days was held in the spring by the Pagan Mexicans. … Such a Lent of forty days was observed in Egypt … This Egyptian Lent of forty days … was held expressly in commemoration of Adonis or Osiris, the great mediatorial god.”
“Among the Pagans this Lent seems to have been an indispensable preliminary to the great annual festival in commemoration of the death and resurrection of Tammuz, which was celebrated by alternate weeping and rejoicing.”
“This difference, in point of time, betwixt the Christian Pasch, as observed in Britain by the native Christians, and the Pagan Easter enforced by Rome, at the time of its enforcement, was a whole month; and it was only by violence and bloodshed, at last, that the Festival of the Anglo-Saxon or Chaldean goddess came to supersede that which had been held in honour of Christ.”
“The “buns,” … were used in the worship of the queen of heaven, the goddess Easter, as early as the day of Cecrops, the founder of Athens-that is, 1500 years before the Christian era.”
Considering the pagan origin of Lent and Easter, it is of interest to note that the movie “The Passion of the Christ” was introduced in movie theaters (temples of Dionysian worship) on the first day of Lent (Ash Wednesday). Such timing would be appropriate for a movie about the death and resurrection of the Satanic Messiah, the Eucharistic Jesus (See Appendix III).
As previously discussed, movie theaters evolved from Greek theaters; and Greek theaters evolved from Dionysian worship, Dionysus being one of the many names of the Satanic Messiah who supposedly was killed and resurrected. The worship of Dionysus was performed in a theater as a play, just like the Abydos Passion Play of Osiris (See Appendix III). The same satanic theme of death and resurrection of a savior is repeated again and again in pagan civilizations.
“…this festival was held in a theater, and the ceremony was the performance of a play. The greatest poetry of Greece was written in honor of Dionysus. The performances were sacred, and the spectators, writers and the actors were all engaged in an act of worship.” (27)
Please note, the spectators are also involved in the act of worship of Dionysus/Satan. Since movie theaters are Temples of Dionysian worship, attendance by Evangelical Christians in movie theaters is idolatry, no matter the subject portrayed in the performance.
The story of Dionysus is a repeat of the story of Osiris.
“…He (Dionysus) was torn to pieces, in some stories by the Titans, in others by Hera’s orders. He was always brought back to life; he died and rose again. It was his joyful resurrection they celebrated in his theater.”
“He was the assurance that death does not end all. His worshipers believed that his death and resurrection showed that the soul lives on forever after the body dies. This faith was part of the mysteries of Eleusie.” (28)
In his book entitled “The gods of the Lodge”, published in 1990, R.C. Haupt, Jr. summarized the Satanic Deception very well (27):
“Satan had been successful in misleading God’s people with a myth of a powerful resurrected god by the name of On or Osiris. He had counterfeited the cross. He had given the world a resurrected god 2,000 years before Christ!”
“The myths passed from Egypt to Greece in the form of the gods named Dionysus and Mithra. Each of these were betrayed by their own, killed and resurrected to godship as we have seen in preceding chapters. They were the favorite gods of the most powerful and learned nations on the earth at the time of the birth of Rome. Again, Satan had been successful in mocking the cross and the resurrection of the Savior of this world.”
“With the advent of the Roman Empire, Dionysus became the resurrected god named Bacchus, and Adonis, or Tammuz, as referred to in the book of Ezekiel in chapter 8, another god that lived, was killed, and rose again to glory. These resurrected gods (through myth only) were in place and being worshipped at the time of the birth and the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”
“Hence, the resurrection of Jesus did not take the world by storm. They were used to it.”
“The Jews rejected Him and the spiritual kingdom of Jesus Christ was born. The Church survived!”
“Satan in all his cunning attacked the church. This time it was from within. Thus a doctrine that encompassed and honored Osiris, Dionysus, Bacchus and the rest of the phony resurrected gang, infiltrated the foundations of the church.”
For more details about the pagan origin of the movie “The Passion of the Christ”, see Appendix III.
The dating of Passover is based on the Hebrew calendar whereas the dating of Easter requires information about the cycle of the moon, the dates of the Roman calendar, and the days of the week. The day of Easter is defined as the first Sunday following the vernal equinox, which was fixed at March 21 in the Roman calendar. So March 22 is the lower limit in the dating of Easter. The upper limit depends on the cycle of the moon. Easter must occur after the first full moon after the vernal equinox. However, if the first full moon occurs on a Sunday, which means if Passover Nisan 15 occurs on a Sunday, Easter was to be celebrated the following Sunday. All these requirements push the upper limit for dating Easter to April 25. The Imperial Christian Church did not want to celebrate Easter on the day of Passover. According to the encyclopedia Britannica 11th Edition, volume 4, under Calendar, pg. 998, commenting on the dating of Easter:
“The epacts are also placed so as to indicate the full moons generally one or two days after the true full moons; but this was done purposely, to avoid the chance of concurring with the Jewish Passover, which the framers of the calendar seem to have considered a greater evil than that of celebrating Easter a week too late.”
The Imperial Christian Church not only needed the Metonic cycle of 19 years, but also the Dominical cycle of 28 years. The Dominical cycle derives its name from Dominus meaning Lord because it was used to pinpoint Sunday (Day of the Imperial Christian lord) occurrences during that cycle. The Dominical cycle is based on the fact that due to leap years, the recurrence of Sunday, or any other day of the week, on the same date of the Roman month required 28 years. The Dionysian cycle is the product of the Metonic cycle of 19 years and the Dominical cycle of 28 years, that is a 532 year cycle. Therefore the Dionysian cycle marked the recurrence of the same phase of the moon on the same day of the week and the same date of the Roman month.
The Dionysian cycle started with the Apotheosis by the priests of Jupiter Ammon at the temple of Jupiter Ammon at Alexandria, Egypt in 8 BC, of Augustus Caesar as a reincarnation of the god Dionysus. The main festival for the worship of Dionysus was the theater with performances of plays, drama, comedy and satyrs (10). Today, Hollywood is the center of Dionysian worship. The best performers are given a small statue of the sungod. Oscar derives from two Etruscan words meaning sungod, just like the Sanskrit word namascar means to bow to, to worship the sungod Siva in the practice of Yoga. In the March 2004 issue of Yoga International, Rolf Sovik discussed the great mantra to Shiva, the Lord of Yogis: “OM. We worship and adore you, O three eyed one, O Shiva…” The practice of yoga is a form of worship of Dionysius/Shiva/Satan (See Chapter II and Appendix II). Hollywood and yoga go hand in hand. Dionysus, the god of Hollywood introduced Shiva, the god of Yoga, to Christian America. It was love at first sight. Some 18 million Americans now practice Yoga, instead of preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to Hindus.
The complex tables for dating Easter during a full Dionysian cycle of 532 years were computed in Alexandria, Egypt by Dionysian monks at the temple of Jupiter Ammon. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Vol. 7, pages 828 and 829, under the heading of Easter:
“There is no indication of the observance of the Easter festival in the New Testament, or in the writings of the apostolic Fathers.”
“The first Christians continued to observe the Jewish festivals, though in a new spirit, as commemorations of events which those festivals had foreshadowed.”
“The correct date of the Easter festival was to be calculated at Alexandria, the home of astronomical science, and the bishop of that see was to announce it yearly to the churches under his jurisdiction, and also to the occupant of the Roman see, by whom it was to be communicated to the Western churches.”
The year 524 AD marked the end of the first Dionysian cycle of 532 years, which started in 8 BC at the apotheosis of Augustus as an incarnation of Dionysus. Dionysus Exiguus who supposedly was the monk who invented the AD dating system in 524 AD based on the birth of Jesus Christ, was really the exact (exiguus) Dionysian (Dionysus) cycle which ended in 524 AD. Bible scholars swallowed the Dionysian forgery bait, hook and sinker. The AD dating has nothing to do with Jesus Christ. The AD dating system started at the apotheosis of Augustus Caesar as the incarnation of Apollo in 15 BC of our common era. The tables for computation of the day of Easter were compiled in Alexandria for a complete Dionysian cycle. Symbolically, Dionysus was supposed to reincarnate at the end of every Dionysian cycle, which was the time for calendar reform, and for the computation of the next cycle of 532 years.
The end of the first Dionysian cycle occurred during the pontificate of John I, Pope #53, who ruled from 523 to 526 AD (Table II). Pope John I was the first Pope to leave Italy for the east. He ratified the Alexandrian computation of the date of Easter for the second Dionysian cycle of 532 years. Pope Gregory VII, #155, ratified the third Dionysian cycle at the same time Omar Khayyam initiated calendar reform in Persia at the end of the 11th century. Pope Gregory XIII, #224, initiated the Gregorian calendar reform at the beginning of the fourth Dionysian cycle toward the end of the 16th century. Gregory XIII celebrated the fourth Dionysian cycle with the St. Bartholomew massacre of Huguenot Christians, and ordered a medal struck in commemoration of this bloody event. (See Chapter III). The initiation of a fifth Dionysian cycle in the year 2120 AD is very unlikely. The bloody game will be over before then, with the return of the KING of kings, His Majesty Jesus Christ.
Since Augustus was deified as an incarnation of Dionysus, who is Dionysus? Let us consult the Oxford Classical Dictionary (10).
Dionysus: “is the twice-born son of Zeus and Semele.”
“Hades and Dionysus are the same according to Heraclitus.”
Hades is the lord of the dead and is sometimes called Chthonian Zeus (10). The Hindu gods Vishnu the preserver and Siva the destroyer are two different aspects of the same roman Jupiter (29). The Dionysian cycle of 532 years used to compute the day of Easter is connected with the lord of the dead, Hades/Dionysus/Zeus/Jupiter/ Vishnu/Siva. The Egyptian Osiris has the title “lord of the dead”. So, the Greek Dionysus is also the Egyptian Osiris, and we are back to the Isis/Osiris/Sirius connection again, Sirius being the original location of the amphibian reptilian demons who corrupted mankind.
In order to impose Sunday and Easter instead of the weekly Sabbath and the 14th of Nisan as respectively weekly day of rest with the Lord and celebration of the Lord’s Supper, the Imperial bishop of Rome, Victor I (AD 189-198), issued a decree ordering the clergy everywhere to observe Easter on the first Sunday following the first full moon after the vernal Equinox. A lordly command issuing from one bishop over the others was something new in the world (30). In order for the reader to understand the evolution of the Papacy from Bishop of Rome to Supreme Ruler of planet earth under Antichrist, the key players are listed in Table II chronologically with their accomplishments. Victor I was the first bishop of Rome to rub shoulders with the Imperial house (Table II). The church of Alexandria, Egypt and the church of Rome worked hand in hand to suppress Evangelical Christian practices. Remember, Alexandria was where Augustus was deified as a reincarnation of Dionysus at the Temple of Jupiter Ammon in 8BC, and also where his uncle Julius 40 years before, on Christmas day, was deified.
After Victor I’s decree, a series of correspondence started between him and the startled Evangelical bishops. One such letter is from Polycrates to Victor I. After dropping a few names of bishops who celebrated the Lord’s Supper according to the Hebrew calendar on Nisan 14, names like the apostles John and Philip, and many other bishops, he wrote:
“All these observed the fourteenth day of the Passover according to the gospel, deviating in no respect, but following the rule of faith…Better people than I have said: We must obey God rather than men!
(Acts 5:29)” (31)
In response to the protest of Evangelical Christian bishops, Victor I threatened to excommunicate them. This started the Quartodeciman controversy. Quartodeciman means fourteen, like fourteen of Nisan. Victor I was assisted by Clement of Alexandria who did an outstanding job from an Imperial Christian viewpoint. He was the first to call Sunday the Lord’s day (30).
This quartodeciman controversy lasted over a century until Imperial Christian Emperor Constantine Augustus sided with Rome. The first Ecumenical council of Nicea in AD 325 ratified that decision. Four years previously, emperor Constantine Augustus, in AD321, enacted the constitution of Constantine requiring Sunday to be a day of rest.
“The earliest recognition of the observance of Sunday as a legal duty is a constitution of Constantine in 321 AD, enacting that all courts of justice, inhabitants of towns, and workshops were to be at rest on Sunday (venerabili die solis), with an exception in favour of those engaged in agricultural labour” (32).
He called Sunday the venerable day of the Sun. He worshipped the sun god Mithras, the equivalent of the Indo-Iranian savior Mithra (The Seed) who traveled west in the second and third centuries AD. Just like all the Roman emperors before him and after him until the end of the fourth century AD, Constantine Augustus held the title of Pontifex Maximus (Vicar) of Jupiter. He completed the basilica for Jupiter worship started by Maxentius. In his letters to Imperial Christian bishops, Constantine Augustus supported the sanctification of Sunday and the celebration of Easter. He called this doctrine the lawful and most holy Catholic Religion (33). Those who refused to follow this doctrine were called base and perverse. In AD363, the Council of Laodicea forbade Christians from judaizing, that is Sabbath keeping. In all those decrees, Sunday was called the Lord’s day, thanks to Clement of Alexandria.
This council’s canon 29 reads:
“Christians shall not Judaize and be idle on Saturday, but shall work on that day; but the Lord’s day they shall especially honor, and, as being Christians, shall, if possible, do no work on that day” (34).
In AD380, Emperors Gratian, Valentinian II and Theodosius I reaffirmed the doctrine of Constantine Augustus’ “lawful and most holy Catholic Religion” and added the name Christian to give Pope Damasus I more credibility as a successor of the apostle Peter. This edict then stated:
“We order those who follow this doctrine to receive the title of Catholic Christians, but others we judge to be mad and raving and worthy of incurring the disgrace of heretical teaching, nor are their assemblies to receive the name of churches. They are to be punished not only by Divine retribution but also by our own measures, which we have decided in accordance with Divine inspiration.”
Evangelical Christianity does not worship the same deity as the one worshipped by Imperial Christianity. Therefore, Evangelical and Imperial Christians together means, Evangelical Christians compromising their faith. The three Graces, daughters of Zeus, Charisma, Roma, and Apostasia may ecumenize together, but Evangelina, the future Bride of Jesus Christ, is unable to attend due to previous commitment. From the Evangelical and Imperial versions of the Decalogue (Table IV), it is obvious that we are dealing with two different deities. In the first Commandment, the Evangelical God will not tolerate any other gods, whereas the Imperial god is more tolerant and open-minded, limiting this restriction only to “strange Gods.” A “strange God” could mean the Evangelical Deity, however.
The Evangelical God, in the second Commandment makes it very clear that He is a jealous God, forbidding idolatry. The Imperial god, being more tolerant, omitted this offensive commandment showing great respect for the beliefs and religious practices of all religions of the world, knowing full well that those religious beliefs came from the Serpent Kings of antiquity, these amphibian demons who worked for him.
Of the ten Imperial commandments, the one that identifies the Imperial god best is the Imperial III, an evolution from the Evangelical IV.
The reader may remember that the Creator sanctified the seventh day of the week, gave it a name, the Sabbath. This was a Creation ordinance that became the Evangelical IV. Sabbath keeping is an acknowledgment that the God being worshipped is the Creator of heaven and earth. No other god can make that claim.
The Evangelical IV is too exclusive, therefore, very offensive to the Imperial god, the sun deity whose day of worship is the venerable day of the Sun, that is Sunday. It would be too obvious if the Imperial III stated: Remember to keep holy the venerable day of the invincible Sun deity, Satan. This is where Clement of Alexandria shines brightly. He was the first, 1800 years ago to call Sunday “the Lord’s day,” even though Jesus Christ said the Lord’s day is the Sabbath:
For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.
(Matthew 12:8)
The problem is solved. Call Sunday “the Lord’s day” in the Imperial III, Lord Lucifer’s day that is. The Evolution of Lucifer via 8 stations is displayed on Table III.
To wrap it up, Table V contains a comparison between Evangelical Christianity and Imperial Christianity.
Sunday or the Sabbath? That is the big question. There is a great Imperial Christian revival going on to conquer Evangelical Christian America. Sanctification of Sunday in disobedience to the Creator is being promoted from every corner.
Sunday is referred to as the Sabbath in “Christian” periodicals and new calendars are released with the days of the week placed in such a way to imply that Sunday is the seventh day. The deception continues and will not cease until the return of Jesus Christ.
In the “Christian” periodical called Midnight Call, April 2001 Issue, there is an article by Reverend Thomas Key with the title, “Should We Worship on Saturday or Sunday?” It is amazing how Imperial Christians rationalize the justification of Sunday worship.
After quoting Leviticus 16:31, “It shall be a Sabbath of rest unto you,” the Reverend then went on to identify “unto you” with the Israelites, not the Christians. Obviously, the Reverend did not read Galatians 3:29, and did not understand Matthew 5:17-19.
And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. (Galatians 3:29)
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets:
I am not come to destroy, but to fullfil.
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:17-19)
Then, he stated that Jesus Christ repeatedly broke the Sabbath.
“Jesus Himself, who said He came to fulfill the Law (Matthew 5:17), repeatedly broke the Sabbath. He healed on the Sabbath”.
Can you believe that? The Lord of the Sabbath, who knows what Sabbath keeping is all about, is accused of breaking His own Sabbath. When in fact, Jesus Christ was teaching His critics about the real meaning of Sabbath keeping. If Jesus Christ broke the Sabbath, which is the fourth commandment, then He did not fulfill the Law and therefore did not qualify as Redeemer of mankind. The Reverend destroyed the foundation of Evangelical Christianity by the implications of his statement. Therefore, we must await the revealing of the Imperial Christ, the new Augustus Caesar, that is the Antichrist, in order to take the “mark” and achieve satanic salvation, more accurately, eternal damnation.
To further quote the Reverend:
“In my estimation, Sabbath keeping would be very difficult if not impossible.”
“Few today would tolerate not being allowed to travel…”
But, the Reverend has only good things to say about Sunday keeping. That is where Clement of Alexandria becomes handy.
“Revelation 1:10 speaks of the Lord’s day, which is a typical term for the Sunday of worship observed by early Christians because that was the day of the Lord’s resurrection.” “The early Church worshipped as Christians on Sunday.”
In the encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, volume 26, page 95, under “Sunday”:
“There is no evidence that in the earliest years of Christianity, there was any formal observance of Sunday as a day of rest or any general cessation of work” (32).
Some more Sunday promoting quotes:
“As a result of the preaching, the church was born and grew, with Sunday as the primary day of worship” (35)
“Since exaltation and promised rewards come from one day of rest and worship, I determine to remake my Sunday according to the biblical model.” (36)
“In the New Testament we begin to find hints that Christians regularly assembled for the Eucharist on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7, 8), observing it as the Lord’s day” (Rev. 1:10) (37).
Lets analyze this last statement:
“Christians regularly assembled for the Eucharist on the first day of the week.”
“observing it as the Lord’s day.”
In the encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, volume 26, page 95, under “Sunday”:
“There is no evidence that in the earliest years of Christianity, there was any formal observance of Sunday as a day of rest or any general cessation of work” (32).
The Roman Catholic Eucharist is not the Lord’s supper when a small group of Christians gathered on the 14th of Nisan, no matter what day of the week it occurred, to break bread and share wine in remembrance of our Redeemer Jesus Christ. Actually, that is all Jesus Christ requested from His disciples as a yearly feast. The Eucharist requires a magical procedure to summon the Sun deity Osiris/Satan to come down in the sun-shaped wafer which is imprinted with the monogram of Osiris, god of the dead; that is I H S, which stands for Isis, Horus, Seb (Osiris). The Eucharist is an abomination to the LORD.
A son honoureth his father, and a servant his master: if then I be a father, where is mine honour? and if I be a master, where is my fear? saith the LORD of hosts unto you, O priests, that despise my name. And ye say, Wherein have we despised thy name?
Ye offer polluted bread upon mine altar; and ye say, Wherein have we polluted thee? In that ye say, The table of the LORD is contemptible.
(Malachi 1:6,7)Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and of the table of devils. Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he? (1 Corinthians 10:21,22)
The Ten Commandments have been under attack recently for being old fashioned, non relevant in our modern world and offensive to Satan’s devotees. There is no question that The Decalogue is very offensive to Satan and his devotees. But, has anyone come up with an ecumenical alternative acceptable to Satan’s priests of the Society of Salve Regina Isis? After all, they are the ones behind all this Communist/Humanist/Antichristian propaganda. Fortunately, the answer is yes. Published in 2001, this small booklet, entitled “Seven words that can change the world”, by Reverend Joseph R. Simonetta, has finally come up with a solution (38). Simonetta’s curriculum vitae is impressive. Just to name a few of his accomplishments: master of divinity degree from Harvard Divinity School; master of architecture degree; twice a nominee for Congress, and a nominee for president. To top it off, he was born in Bethlehem (Pennsylvania). In the promotional material by the publisher, we read: “This slim, eloquent call to action for global change reminds us of the three basic truths that must become the new Commandments of the modern world if humanity is to survive.”
What got Simonetta started on this project? “Curious to know what my fellow divinity students at Harvard thought about the need for a new belief system, I took a formal written survey of their opinions.” “there was a strong call for a universal belief system that would be acceptable to everyone and that would honor the dignity of each person.” His vast scientific knowledge about proven facts is fabulous: “Today, we do not need supernatural gods to explain these things. The generally accepted theory for the cause of the universe is the big bang theory.” “… we know Earth has been here for about 4.56 billion years.” His extensive understanding of all the Christian denominations is unbelievable: “Christianity, for example, has approximately thirty-three thousands, eight hundred and thirty denominations.” What does Simonetta offer to replace the Decalogue: “It may be that instead of the Ten Commandments, we require just three simple rules for living that say and do more than these ten.”
The first is be healthy. The second rule is: Be kind. The third simple rule is:
Respect the environment
Then he stated: “It’s of interest to note that none of these three rules appear in the Ten Commandments.” Obviously, the Reverend has been using the Imperial Decalogue. There is no reason to get upset about the Ten Commandments if you intend to spend eternity in the Lake of Fire, commonly known among the initiates as the Greater Lodge on Sirius, where they will be null and void because everyone will be deified at the 5th initiation and there will be no absolute. The Ten Commandments only apply to the disciples of Jesus Christ who are awaiting adoption in God’s Family and who look forward to the New Jerusalem (See Appendix V).
Depart from me, ye evildoers: for I will keep the commandments of my God.
(Psalm 119:115)